Parliament Me History Bani Ya Rules Toote? PM Modi Ka Reply Skip Karna Badi Controversy Ban Gaya Hai Indian Parliament ke itihas mein aisa pehle kabhi nahi hua. PM Narendra Modi ne Lok Sabha mein President ke address par hone wali discussion ka customary reply skip kar diya. Wajah? Speaker Om Birla ka kehna hai ki unke paas "pukka input" tha ki Congress MPs PM par 'hamla' kar sakte hain. Ab Congress ne morcha khol diya hai aur seedha Speaker se pooch liya hai—bhai sahab, ye kaunse rule book mein likha hai?
Security Ka Bahana Ya Sawalon Se Bachne Ka Rasta?
4 February ko jab PM Modi ko apna reply dena tha, tab House mein kafi hungama hua. Kuch women Opposition MPs ne banners dikhaye, lekin Speaker ne jo reason diya wo sabke gale nahi utar raha. Om Birla ne kaha ki unhone khud PM ko salaah di ki wo House mein na aayein kyunki unhe "definite information" mili thi ki kuch "unprecedented" hone wala hai. Rahul Gandhi ne is par chuski lete hue wahi purana dialogue mara—"Jo uchit samjha woh kiya." Ye wahi line hai jo PM ne 2020 mein Ladakh incursion ke waqt Army ke liye use ki thi. Lekin yahan sawal ye hai ki kya desh ka Prime Minister itna insecure ho gaya hai ki wo Parliament ke andar Opposition se darne laga hai?
Rule Book Ka Kya Hua?
Congress MP K.C. Venugopal ne Speaker ko ek kadak letter likha hai. Unhone do bade points uthaye hain:
- Rule 20: Iske mutabiq President ke address par discussion PM ke reply ke saath hi khatam honi chahiye. Agar PM nahi aa sakte, toh unhe House ko formally inform karna hota hai. Yahan aisa kuch nahi hua.
- Rule 362: Agar House bina reply ke discussion band karna chahta hai, toh ek resolution pass hona chahiye. Speaker ne bina kisi resolution ke hi chapter close kar diya.
Venugopal ka seedha sawal hai—"Sir, aapne kaunsa procedure follow kiya, zara humein bhi toh bataiye?"
BJP Ke Bizarre Claims: 'Kaat Lenge' Se Lekin 'Kapde Phaadne' Tak
Is poore drama mein BJP spokespersons ne jo logic diye hain, wo sunkar kisi ka bhi sar chakraya jaye. TV debates mein ek ne claim kiya ki Congress ki women MPs PM ko 'kaat' (bite) sakti thi. Dusre ne kaha ki MPs apne kapde phaad kar BJP par ilzam laga deti. Matlab, logic ki toh aisi-taisi kar di gayi hai. Ek taraf hum 'Vishwaguru' banne ki baat karte hain aur dusri taraf hamare leaders ko apne hi Parliament mein itna khatra mehsoos ho raha hai?
Is News Ka Asli Matlab Kya Hai?
Dekhiye, ye sirf ek din ki baat nahi hai. Ye ek dangerous trend hai. Parliament debate ke liye hoti hai, lekin agar 'security' ka naam lekar PM ko reply dene se hi rok diya jaye, toh democratic traditions ka kya hoga? Kaun fayde mein hai? Filhaal toh PMO, kyunki unhe Opposition ke chubhte hue sawalon ka face-to-face jawab nahi dena pada. Kaun tension mein hai? Speaker Om Birla. Unhe ab ye prove karna padega ki unke paas waqayi koi "concrete information" thi ya ye sirf ek political move tha PM ko protect karne ke liye. Ground reality ye hai ki agar rules ko aise hi bypass kiya gaya, toh aane wale waqt mein koi bhi leader kisi bhi uncomfortable situation se bachne ke liye 'security threat' ka card khel dega.
| Point | Speaker/Govt Version | Opposition Version |
|---|---|---|
| Action | PM skipped the customary reply to President's address. | Unprecedented move; breaking parliamentary tradition. |
| Reason | "Pukka input" of planned physical attack/disruption by MPs. | Excuse to avoid answering tough questions in the House. |
| Authority | Speaker advised PM not to attend for security reasons. | Questioned which rule book allows skipping the reply. |
| Evidence | Cites "definite information" about "unprecedented" events. | Claims banners by women MPs are being used as a shield. |
Key Highlights:
- First time in history a PM skipped this reply.
- Speaker Om Birla claims security threat to PM.
- Congress demands clarification on parliamentary rules.
- Rahul Gandhi calls it an escape from accountability.